Happiness or duty: aristotle and kants approach on moral reason essay

As we have discussed in previous essays, Kant believed that moral rules could be known through reason and not just by observation Shaw and Barry

Happiness or duty: aristotle and kants approach on moral reason essay

Aristotle and Emmanuel Kant were two philosophers who tried, and somehow succeeded, in solving complex ethical dilemmas. These two philosophers wrote theories about different human actions, and tried to explain the ethical thing to do in certain situations.

Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics Essay example Words | 5 Pages. In Book 1 of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he argues that happiness is the best good, and the goal of an individual and of those leading and governing society. Happiness or Duty: Aristotle and Kants Approach on Moral Reason Essay Sample Both Aristotle and Kant have written teachings dealing with reasoning in ethics. This . Aristotle’s teleological ethics: the reason for being. Aristotle focused on the peoples actions whether good or bad, as well as their character, not there right or wrong actions. Immanuel Kant () branches of philosophy included contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics.

While Kant, observed obligation and duty from a law perspective, Aristotle envisioned on the aim of life. Their unique points of view towards human behavior offer different answers to the question of good.

Despite having many differences, Kant and Aristotle, a host of similar ideas binds them together.

Ethical Theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant | Essay Writing Blog

Both of them were always optimistic, always believing that all human beings are ethical naturally. Both of them also always applied the concept of reason.

In addition, they encouraged people to live and act well by employing good character and virtuous behavior. Both of these philosophers believed in the concept of self-actualization, which refers to being and living the best a person can be.

To them, an ethical, human being must be responsible for his or her actions, and ethical. Every human being has an obligation to the world and towards a certain society. The aim of this paper is to compare and contrast the ethical theories of Kant and Aristotle. The paper will also highlight which of the two theories is superior and why.

Teleological ethics means that ethics has a purpose or a reason. Aristotle emphasized the doctrine of the mean highly; always citing that there is a need to maintain a balance in everything a person does or says.

In addition, Aristotle theorized that happiness is the main goal of the human race and discussed the notion that people develop virtuous habits in order to build good character.

Aristotle and Immanuel Kant

Aristotle in his theories explained the way that reaching individual potential, acting well and living well ultimately leads to happiness McKeon Aristotle theorized that people should be always basing their actions on reason; reason controls desire at all times.

Their view of the world is different from the way that we see the modern society today; they saw the world as a whole, with an unending connection of everything to everything. A macro cosmos exists, which is the unity of everything.

This cosmos consists of the sun, planets, the world and the galaxy. In this colossal macro cosmos, man is a micro cosmos, a part and a reflection of the whole. Aristotle looked at the ethics from the point of view of the Greeks. Ethics operate in the realm of opinion and meanings, evolving within the limits of human observations.

After looking at creatures, he had a belief that all living things have internal goals Ferguson All human beings thus work to achieve their goals.Short speech about Aristotle Essay Sample. This speech is about the great ancient Greek philosopher, Aristotle.

Happiness or Duty: Aristotle and Kants Approach on Moral Reason. Pages: 6 Word Count: Their negative attribute is the reason for the misfortune that occurs in their life, which is seen over and over again in plays.

Happiness or Duty: Aristotle and Kants Approach on Moral Reason Essay Sample Both Aristotle and Kant have written teachings dealing with reasoning in ethics.

This is as far as the similarity between the two goes. Kant is known for his theory that there is a single moral obligation, which he called the “Categorical Imperative”, and is derived from the concept of duty.

Custom Aristotle and Immanuel Kant Essay Philosophers live and always encourage the human race to live in accordance with the rules of wisdom. Aristotle and Emmanuel Kant were two philosophers who tried, and somehow .

Happiness or duty: aristotle and kants approach on moral reason essay

– Kant (), pp, , Immanuel Kant introduced and initiated his ‘moral law theory’ in the late 18th century. The doctrine in question sought to establish and constitute a . Aristotle and Immanuel Kant are similar in their aapproaches to ethics in so far as they both admire reason or rationality.

Also, their ethics, .

Kant or Utilitarianism - New York Essays